Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Passenger Rail topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff identify Monona lakefront as preferred station area in final draft passenger‑rail study
Summary
A staff final draft recommends the Monona lakefront area as Madison’s preferred passenger‑rail station site, with the Johnson Street yard as a Plan B; the study assumes 3–4 daily round trips initially, 700‑foot platforms and modest station buildings; next steps hinge on WisDOT’s Corridor ID service‑development planning and federal funding.
City transportation staff presented a final draft of the Madison passenger rail station study on Nov. 19 and flagged the Monona lakefront as the top recommended station‑area, with the Johnson Street yard as a secondary option.
Liz Callan, a transportation planner with the City of Madison Department of Transportation, told the commission the study is preliminary and intended to feed into the Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s Corridor ID federal process and a later service development planning phase led by WisDOT and Amtrak.
The study’s assumptions include using existing track corridors, initial service in the range of about 3–4 daily round trips (with the possibility of phased additions), using Siemens Venture cars and locomotives, and a desired platform length of roughly 700 feet. Callan said station facilities for an initial regional service are expected to be modest — on the order of a few thousand square feet (staff estimated roughly 3,000–5,000 square feet) — and could be integrated within new or existing mixed‑use development.
On sites, Callan said the Monona lakefront area near John Nolan Drive and Monona Terrace offers the strongest combination of ridership potential, hotel and visitor proximity, jobs within walking distance and multimodal connections. The Johnson Street yard was identified as a Plan B that offers operational advantages and space for train servicing but would require new track connections and would not place riders as close to the heart of downtown destinations.
On funding and timing, staff reiterated that Corridor ID is a federal pipeline that can lead to later federal grants; subsequent phases generally require local or state matches (staff noted step‑2 planning and final engineering phases can require non‑federal matches of roughly 10–20% depending on the federal program). Callan said the city is not presuming a specific ownership model for a station and that funding and match responsibilities will be refined as WisDOT and Amtrak move the corridor through federal steps.
Commissioners asked about the local match, timeline and operational details (push‑pull train operations were explained by staff). Callan said the report will be finalized after commission feedback, posted publicly and used to inform the next Corridor ID/service development planning phase; staff said a final site decision will be made later in the process when more detailed service and engineering information is available.
What’s next: the report will be finalized, posted online and serve as input to WisDOT’s service development planning; staff said they will update the commission as the corridor process advances and when station‑level decisions are further refined.
