Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Levy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board votes to forward levy pro‑and‑con materials to county for voter pamphlet

Shelton School District Board of Directors · November 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Shelton School District board voted to forward levy pro/con materials to the county for inclusion in the voter pamphlet after staff said one 'for' statement and no 'against' statements were received. The board also discussed levy context and budget projections.

The Shelton School District Board voted to forward levy pro‑and‑con materials to the county to be included in the upcoming voter pamphlet, moving the levy campaign process a procedural step closer to the February ballot. Director Gilmore moved to proceed with the county process and appoint community members to write the pro and con statements; Director Dale seconded the motion and board members responded 'Aye.'

Board members discussed the county’s role in advertising and including the statements in the voter pamphlet. Superintendent Jesse and budget director Clint Sherman provided context: staff said the district received one statement in favor of the levy and no opposing statement during the call for for‑and‑against submissions, so the materials will be delivered to the county for their required election advertising and pamphlet deadlines.

Clint Sherman also provided a brief budget update tied to levy context, saying an apportionment advance initiated in October arrived in November and that the district outperformed expectations by about $400,000. Sherman said enrollment has flattened and remains a metric to watch; the district remains projected to end the year with a positive fund balance.

Board members referenced long‑running state funding changes: Sherman summarized past levy rate shifts after the McCleary decision, noting a historical example where levy rates moved from about $4.50 to new statutory limits (discussion referenced local levy rate history, not a new policy action).

The motion to forward levy materials passed; the board asked staff to get the materials to the county the next morning so the county can process them for the voter pamphlet.