Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Storage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves rezoning for small lot to legalize on-site storage container despite compliance questions
Summary
The commission approved rezoning a 0.383-acre parcel to A-1 and a variance to allow an existing storage container, after extended questioning about whether the structure is a shipping container or a semi-trailer body and whether it must be removed if a house is later built.
The Planning and Zoning Commission on Dec. 2 approved a rezoning and variance to permit an existing on-site storage structure on a 0.383-acre parcel at 10946 East Burke Road, despite discussion among commissioners and staff about whether the item meets the citys accessory-structure rules.
Staff presented the case and said the property owner, Alejandro Daniel Avila, requested rezoning from R-1 to A-1 and a variance from the 1-acre minimum to allow an existing storage container. Commissioners pressed staff and the applicant about noncompliance citations, setbacks and whether the structure is a shipping container or the back of a semi-trailer. One commissioner asked whether the container would have to be removed when a home is built; staff said yes, the structure must be removed if a conventional house is constructed on the lot.
A point of clarification arose over the city code language on accessory structures: city staff read that "storage containers" are allowed under agricultural accessory uses provided building materials and style are similar to the primary structure and permits are pulled for oversized accessory structures. Commissioners noted the property owner had paid a fine but still may be required to move the trailer or container into compliance.
After discussion the commission moved, seconded and approved the rezoning and variance with staffs recommendation. Commissioners instructed staff to follow up with the property owner before the next meeting to ensure clarity on compliance steps and future removal if a house is built.
Quote from the hearing: a commissioner asked, "So if he changes it to an A-1, everything can stay as is?" Staff: "Right." Later, staff reiterated that removal would be required if a conventional house was built.
Next steps: staff will follow up with the owner on compliance, and engineering/building-permit steps will govern any future construction on the parcel.
