Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
City attorneys outline options for a deer‑feeding ballot question; council defers action
Summary
City Attorney Chelsea Nelson presented three ways to place a deer‑feeding prohibition before voters — nonbinding advisory question, council-adopted ordinance subject to referendum, or citizen initiative petition — and council agreed to continue reviewing the ordinance and boundaries rather than take immediate action.
City Attorney Chelsea Nelson outlined three procedural paths on Dec. 15 for addressing whether to prohibit deer feeding on the city ballot: (1) an advisory yes/no question (nonbinding) to gauge public sentiment; (2) council adoption of an ordinance that could then be subject to a referendum petition requiring 7% of votes cast in the last…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
