Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 3400 Classen Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves rezoning of 3400 Classen Boulevard; staff to study traffic signal warrant

Norman Planning Commission · December 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commission approved a straight rezoning to C-2 and a preliminary plat at 3400 Classen Boulevard. Staff noted one protest requesting a signal at Highway 77 and Southlake; transportation staff said signal installation depends on a warrant study and actual traffic volumes.

The Norman Planning Commission approved a straight rezoning to C-2 and a preliminary plat for roughly 1.48 acres at 3400 Classen Boulevard, Ward 7.

Laura Hoggett of the planning department summarized the request as a straight rezoning from A-2 to C-2 and said the site is consistent with the AIM Norman urban living center designation in character and scale. "This is straight C-2 so they, any use that's allowed in C-2 would be allowed on this property," Hoggett told the commission.

Libby Smith, representing the applicant, described the request as speculative rezoning: "We're proposing to rezone it to C-2 general commercial," Smith said, adding the end user is not yet identified and the site plan is illustrative.

Commissioners and staff discussed a single written protest (1.4% of the notification area) that asked for a traffic signal at Highway 77 and Southlake Boulevard. David Riesland, the city's transportation engineer, said whether a signal is installed "has nothing to do with the fees collected. It has to do with... are their traffic volumes sufficient to warrant the installation of a traffic signal?" He explained ODOT would be involved because Classen is an ODOT roadway and that the city has been collecting impact fees toward a signal but must still prove current volumes meet signal warrants.

Several commissioners asked whether the signal warrant study would be done now or later; staff said the warrant study and any construction plans would be completed separately from the current rezoning approval and could require weather‑appropriate traffic counts in January. A motion to approve the rezoning and preliminary plat was moved, seconded and carried 6-0.

What happens next: staff can initiate traffic counts and a warrant study; any signal installation would require engineering plans and coordination with ODOT and funding decisions.