Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board votes to defer layoff of juvenile-detention administrator amid budget concerns

Bridgeport Board of Education · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a motion to defer the layoff of the administrator who oversees education at the juvenile detention center through the end of the 2025–26 school year; the vote passed on roll call, 5–2, with one absence, after staff said state juvenile-department guidance and tuition-reimbursement arrangements limit immediate savings.

Board members voted to defer the layoff of the administrator who supervises education at the juvenile detention center, extending the postponed layoff from the previously scheduled Dec. 30 date to the end of the 2025–26 school year.

Staff presented the agenda item saying the district had initially treated the position as a six-month savings in an earlier budget conversation but that state juvenile-division guidance subsequently required an administrator be on site year-round. Administration estimated the position’s total cost (salary plus benefits) at roughly $160,000 per year and said a six-month deferral equates to about $80,000. Staff also explained the juvenile-division provides tuition-reimbursement allocations from other districts and that funds can be used for staffing and curriculum at the facility.

Board members debated the budgetary trade-offs and whether prior projected savings were accurate. Several members pressed for a clear accounting of how the deferral affects the district’s fiscal gap and where corresponding reductions would be made if needed. One board member also said the state was withholding roughly $5,000,000 and criticized the timing of state decisions in the board’s budget planning.

The board held a roll-call vote. Recorded votes in the transcript were: Yes — Andre Woodson, Jennifer Perez, Burkes Jennings (recorded as 'same'), Lamond Daniels and Mister Treiber (5 yes). No — Mister Sokolovic and Mister Medina (2 no). Mister Benahan Grajales was absent. The motion passed. Administration said it will work to identify funding offsets and next steps and that the position will be retained for student-supervision requirements while the district addresses budget implications.