Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kane County agriculture committee approves amended ordinance language recognizing agriculture's historic role
Summary
The Kane County Agriculture Committee voted Dec. 18 to approve amended ordinance language (Version 2, as amended) that adds a statement recognizing agriculture as historically the county's largest land use; the amendment passed on roll call and will move through the county ordinance process.
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair Leslie Juby called the Kane County Agriculture Committee to order on Dec. 18 and led approval of an amended ordinance that adds language recognizing agriculture as historically the county's largest land use.
The committee considered two draft formulations: one noting that agriculture is a land use in most townships and a second stating that agriculture is the largest land use in the county. After discussion about whether the phrase refers to acreage or assessed valuation, committee member Leonard proposed an amendment to Version 2 to add wording stating agriculture "is a leading industry in Kane County and is historically the largest land use." The amendment was seconded and approved by roll call.
The roll call on the amendment recorded the following affirmative responses: Allen (I), Leonard (yes), Hennessy (yes), Roth (yes) and Chair Leslie Juby (I). The chair announced the amended Version 2 will be added to the agenda exhibit and forwarded through the county ordinance review process.
Members framed the change as a clarification to better reflect current practice and to make the ordinance durable. "No farms, no food," Chair Juby said during the discussion, underlining the committee's intent to emphasize agriculture's local importance.
Committee members debated whether to include a numerical acreage target or to footnote the factual basis; staff noted the county's strategic plan previously indicated agriculture constitutes more than 50% of land use in the county. The committee agreed to move the amended wording forward rather than delay for a new acreage calculation.
The committee also moved to place reports on file and adjourned. Because this vote amends ordinance language, the change will next proceed through additional county committee reviews and then to the county board for final consideration.

