Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Revenue topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Roselle staff propose expanding amusement tax to streaming and raising video-gaming terminal fees

Village of Roselle Village Board · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff proposed increasing the village amusement tax from 3% to 5% and expanding the tax base to include streaming services, and proposed raising video-gaming terminal fees to $750 per terminal — both measures are on the next meeting agenda for formal vote.

Roselle’s finance director presented two revenue changes the board will consider at an upcoming meeting: an amendment to the amusement tax and an increase to video-gaming terminal fees.

Finance Director Tom Dahl told the board the draft ordinance would raise the amusement tax rate from 3% to 5% and expand the taxable base to include video-streaming services. He said the ordinance would exclude cable service and franchise-fee-covered video services per state model ordinance language and that staff will include state statute citations in the final draft. Dahl said staff identified more than 50 providers to notify by certified letter and phone and budgeted a conservative estimate of $100,000 in new revenue, with upside potentially reaching $200,000 as the program scales.

Dahl also described a proposed change to the Class T liquor license terminal fee for video gaming terminals, proposing a fee of $750 per terminal. He said that change is included in the 2026 budget and could increase village revenue by about $50,000. Board members asked for the list of providers being contacted and for additional revenue-per-terminal figures; Dahl agreed to provide those figures before the next meeting.

Both items were discussed and placed on the agenda for a vote at the board’s next meeting; no vote was taken Dec. 2.