Board affirms expulsion for 'student number 1,' holds days in abeyance
Loading...
Summary
A board resolved to affirm the expulsion of 'student number 1,' citing violations of the student code including a weapon allegation; the board held days of expulsion in abeyance conditioned on the student's completion of specified requirements and voted to approve the resolution by roll call.
A board moved and voted to affirm an expulsion appeal for an individual identified in the transcript as “student number 1,” the presiding officer announced.
A board member (identified in the transcript as Speaker 2) moved "to affirm based upon the finding and determination of the Board that student number 1 engaged in the alleged conduct in violation of [the] code of student conduct," citing sections in the transcript labeled for "detrimental behavior, general misbehavior," "disruption of school," and a section described in the transcript as "weapon." The motion said the expulsion "with days held in abeyance conditioned on student number one's fulfillment of certain requirements is appropriate to ensure student number 1 receives necessary support throughout the abeyance period." The motion was seconded by another participant (Speaker 1).
After no questions were recorded, the presiding officer conducted a roll call. The transcript records affirmative votes from Missus Schrock, Mister McMath, Mister Galentine (spelled this way in the first roll-call exchange; a later occurrence in the transcript renders the name as 'Gallantyne'), Missus Fontana and Mister Rickwick. The presiding officer then stated, "Motion carries." The transcript does not record any dissenting votes or abstentions for this item.
The resolution therefore passed by roll-call approval as recorded in the transcript. The transcript does not provide the specific disciplinary requirements the student must complete, nor does it give the student's name; it refers throughout to "student number 1." The board immediately moved to adjourn under Item 15.
The transcript provides the motion language and the roll-call results but does not include a fuller discussion of evidence presented at the hearing, details of the conditions placed on the abeyance, or the specific board that convened. The names called during roll call appear in the transcript as Missus Schrock, Mister McMath, Mister Galentine/Gallantyne (variant spellings), Missus/Miss Fontana and Mister Rickwick.
The next procedural item recorded in the transcript was a motion to adjourn; that vote began but the response for Mister Wrigley was not recorded in the supplied transcript segments.
