Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cinnaminson parent alleges retaliation after raising special-education concerns, asks board to investigate
Summary
A Cinnaminson parent told the school board he filed a retaliation complaint after district communications changed following his advocacy for his son; he read an email from the superintendent saying the district 'will look for guidance from the courts' and asked the board to order an independent investigation.
Scott Nwicky, a Cinnaminson resident who said his address is 830 Hilltop Road, told the Board of Education during public comment that he and his wife filed a formal retaliation complaint on Oct. 27 after a series of interactions with the district regarding their son’s Individualized Education Program.
“In that email, he wrote that because we filed a federal civil rights claim and intend to file a special education due process claim, the district, ‘will look for guidance from the courts to help solve disagreements on placement,’” Nwicky said. He argued that the wording signals the district is treating future IEP meetings as if placement decisions are matters for courts rather than IEP teams.
“Placement decisions are not made by courts. They are made by the IEP team based on the child's individual needs with parents as equal partners,” Nwicky said, adding that recent district communications had become “tense and guarded.” He said an upcoming IEP meeting scheduled for the next day made the alleged change in district tone particularly urgent.
Nwicky asked the board to use its oversight authority to ensure IEP teams conduct open discussions about placement, to confirm that no decisions are being predetermined, and to have the pending retaliation complaint investigated by someone other than the superintendent because, he said, the superintendent’s actions are central to his concerns. The board’s public-record acknowledgement of his comments was limited to a brief “Thank you” recorded in the meeting minutes; no substantive response from the superintendent or other board members is recorded in the meeting transcript.
Why it matters: Parents and educators say the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires IEP teams to make individualized placement decisions with parents as team members. A board investigation or a staff response could affect how the district conducts IEP meetings and handles future complaints.
What’s next: Nwicky said he has filed both a federal civil-rights claim and intends to pursue special-education due process. He requested the board reassign the investigation of his retaliation complaint to someone other than the superintendent. An IEP meeting for his son was scheduled for the following day, according to his public comment.
