Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Office Report topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ethics staff reports training, budget and a vendor complaint involving a police officer; staff recommends closing matter

City of Tallahassee Independent Ethics Board · December 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ethics office updated the board on training, budget items and conference takeaways, and described a vendor allegation that a Tallahassee Police Department officer solicited purchase of an advertisement; staff said there was no sworn complaint and recommended closing the matter while referring jurisdictional questions to the police or city attorney.

At the Dec. 16 meeting, ethics office staff presented an operations report covering Nov. 11–Dec. 9 that included training updates, conference takeaways and budget details, and described a complaint from a vendor involving a Tallahassee Police Department officer.

Staff reported work on an advisory committee course and preparations for 2026 annual ethics training, and summarized attendance at the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws conference, noting procurement panels and ideas for training and social media outreach. The staff presentation included budget line items such as travel for conferences, promotional shirts, an advertising entry ($37 for a campaign contribution refund advertisement), and a vehicle-replacement entry that staff said had been allocated by finance and would net to zero in final accounting. Staff said the office’s current balance is about $434,000.

On a vendor complaint, staff said a complainant — identifying as a registered city vendor and using an encrypted email — said they were solicited by a Tallahassee Police Department officer to purchase an advertisement or commemorative publication; the complainant said the officer referenced support from the police chief and that they felt coerced. Staff told the board they had informed the police chief and the sheriff, shared the advisory opinion referenced in staff notes, and recommended closing the matter because there was no sworn complaint and the subject may be outside the board’s jurisdiction. Board members discussed remedies and whether legislative changes affect the board’s scope; the staff advised the vendor to pursue remedies with the police and suggested the city attorney as an additional contact.

The board voted to close the monthly issue tracking described by staff. Staff also said they will request written concerns from the inspector general to collect all items and may return to the city commission in early 2026 for follow-up.