Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Buellton accepts 9-acre parcel from People's Self-Help Housing, waiving $87,000 trail fee; Council approves 4-1
Summary
Council approved Resolution 25-31 to accept a roughly nine-acre remainder parcel from People's Self-Help Housing and waive certain conditions including an $87,000 trail maintenance impact fee; staff said the parcel offers potential public value (including water supply options) that could exceed trail construction value; the motion passed 4-1 with Council Member Sanchez dissenting.
Buellton — The Buellton City Council voted Thursday to accept a donation and quitclaim of a roughly nine-acre parcel from People's Self-Help Housing and to waive several developer conditions, including an $87,000 trail maintenance impact fee.
Public Works Director Rose Hess told the council staff had reviewed the donation agreement and quitclaim and found the documents acceptable for city acceptance. Hess said the parcel contains features — including potential well sites and open-space value along the riverbed — that staff believes could provide public benefits that may exceed the assessed $87,000 impact fee tied to constructing a trail on the site.
Council Member Sanchez pressed staff for greater clarity on the economics and mapping of the parcel, asking whether the $87,000 was a one-time fee and requesting a clearer exhibit of the boundary where the developer would otherwise be required to build trail improvements. "We don't know what this trail is going to cost by the foot," Sanchez said, urging caution about setting a precedent where developers transfer land rather than build required improvements.
Lauren Nichols, project manager for People's Self-Help Housing, said the remainder parcel measures roughly nine acres and that engineers previously prepared a trail alignment and a prevailing-wage cost estimate — the $87,000 figure — which was reviewed and approved by the city during prior project reviews. Nichols said the condition had never required the developer to construct the trail; rather, the $87,000 was calculated as an impact-fee estimate to be used later for construction when trail segments were connected.
City staff and the council discussed the absence of a formal appraisal; staff said there was no appraisal but that the city assessed "inherent value" in the property on a case-by-case basis and that in this instance the property might yield city benefits (for example, the ability to augment municipal water supply) exceeding the financial value of constructing the trail.
Mayor Silva moved adoption of Resolution 25-31 to accept the donation and quick claim; the motion was seconded and approved by roll call with Council Member Sanchez voting no (vote 4-1). Rose Hess and project representatives were thanked for their presentation.
Council members noted they could decline similar donations in the future if the staff analysis did not show comparable public value. The council did not adopt a separate appraisal requirement tonight, and staff said they would use existing exhibits, conditions and the city's trail plans to guide any future decisions.
