Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oklahoma County Board of Adjustment approves two variances for setback and lot-size

Oklahoma County Board of Adjustment · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Oklahoma County Board of Adjustment unanimously approved a 7-foot setback variance for Robert Ward’s rebuilt home in the tornado-damaged Little Tree Addition and granted a lot-size variance for Karen Livingston’s 1.77-acre R-2 property. Staff reported no formal protests in either case.

The Oklahoma County Board of Adjustment voted unanimously to grant two variances at its meeting.

A county staff member described Robert Ward’s request for a property in the Little Tree Addition that was damaged by a November tornado and is being rebuilt. “He is asking to be 7 feet into the 25 feet,” the staff member said, referring to the 25-foot setback requirement. The board moved to approve Ward’s variance and recorded aye votes from Randy Goodman and Cooper Robinson.

The board also considered a variance for Karen Livingston’s property off Southeast 15th Street, east of Harrah Road, where staff said the lot measures 1.77 acres in a zone that requires 2 acres under the county’s R-2 (rural residential) rules. Staff told the board that the prior manufactured home had been a grandfathered, nonconforming use and that replacing it triggered the need to meet current lot-size requirements; staff said there were no formal protests and noted a similar variance had been approved for a nearby parcel in early 2024. The board approved Livingston’s request on a roll call in which Goodman and Robinson voted aye.

Earlier in the meeting, the board approved the minutes from the previous session (listed as 11/18/2025) by motion and roll call. With no new business raised, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made and seconded and the meeting concluded.

Minutes and staff summaries recorded that both variance requests were granted without recorded opposition. The approvals were routine motions on the consent/decision track: staff provided background about the local zoning requirements and the board voted to grant relief in each case. No conditions, appeals, or dissenting votes were recorded in the transcript.