Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Rewrite topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stowe council adopts comprehensive zoning rewrite after members add density and dispensary limits
Summary
After hours of public comment and multiple amendments, Stowe City Council adopted a 354‑page overhaul of its planning and zoning code and new zoning map. Council restored conditional review for some small multifamily forms, added a 6‑unit‑per‑acre cap in targeted provisions, and tightened dispensary buffers.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Rewrite topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stowe City Council on Dec. 4 adopted a comprehensive rewrite of the city’s planning and zoning code, concluding a months‑long process that included public hearings, planning‑commission review and several council‑level amendments.
The ordinance, filed as 2025‑208, replaces the existing code and adopts a new zoning map. The rewrite was presented to council after the Planning Commission recommended approval. During the public hearing, multiple residents urged caution about increased density and the treatment of nonconforming lots. "People shouldn't incur the extra cost, the time to start up a business," resident Brian Loudermilk said, warning that some changes could alter the look and feel of established neighborhoods.
Council members debated a package of amendments before the final vote. One amendment restored conditional review for certain duplexes, triplexes and similar small multifamily forms in specified locations so proposals must come before the planning commission and council rather than being approved administratively. Another amendment added a density cap for multifamily developments in the relevant sections, stating that "the density of a multifamily development shall not exceed six dwelling units per acre," language carried over from the old code.
Council also addressed adult‑use cannabis in the rewrite. After discussion of local buffers and the state framework, council amended the proposed buffer distance for certain land‑use protections from 500 feet back to 1,000 feet for the categories cited in the amendment. Law Director Riley explained the state excise and host‑community formula earlier in the evening and warned council that allocations are remitted by the state and can be volatile.
Supporters of the rewrite argued the update brings clarity, efficiency and new tools for redevelopment along main corridors while maintaining protections for single‑family neighborhoods. "We made a conscious choice to protect our single‑family majority neighborhoods by allowing slightly more density only on main roads where infrastructure can accommodate it," a council member noted during debate.
Opponents and some residents urged caution, citing potential infrastructure strain — particularly water and sewer capacity — and the perceived uneven treatment of owners of adjacent nonconforming lots. Planning staff said many of the code changes were intended to reduce frequent variances and modernize outdated standards.
The council adopted the amended ordinance at third reading after roll‑call votes on the individual amendments and final passage. The ordinance will take effect according to its terms and the new zoning map will become the city’s regulatory baseline for future development review.
Council and staff said they will continue to monitor implementation and brought forward several conforming edits to ensure the code’s provisions align across sections.

