Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth staff present traffic‑calming policy; council raises concerns over petition thresholds and equity
Summary
Staff returned a draft traffic‑calming policy that uses a four‑phase process (study, non‑intrusive measures, enforcement, physical devices) with petition and neighborhood‑support thresholds; council asked for clearer petition forms, raised equity concerns about cost‑sharing for physical devices, and staff agreed to publish forms and return with clarified numbers.
City staff presented a draft Traffic Calming Policy to guide resident requests, evaluation and installation of speed‑reduction measures on eligible local and collector streets.
Rodney Wright, staff presenting the draft, said the policy is designed to manage speeds while maintaining access. The process is divided into four phases: Phase 1 (initial speed study, education, 45–60 days), Phase 2 (non‑intrusive measures such as pavement markings and feedback signs, 60 days), Phase 3 (enforcement measures with a 60% neighborhood support threshold and council resolution followed by 60 days of enforcement/monitoring), and Phase 4 (physical devices such as speed tables, bumpouts and traffic circles requiring 75% neighborhood support and public‑safety review).
Wright detailed petition mechanics: an application submitted by a civic league or by one resident supported by 10 residents will trigger the process; petitions require one verified signature per address with verification via property or utility records; the staff will define a service area for each request and compute the exact number of household signatures required to meet the percent threshold so petitioners know the target before they collect signatures.
Councilmembers asked staff to prepare a specific petition form and clearer website guidance. Councilwoman McGrath warned that allowing civic leagues with money to opt in for Phase 4 cost‑sharing could create an optics problem favoring affluent neighborhoods; staff pointed to neighborhood incentive grants and said the city will budget traffic‑calming funds annually and that neighborhoods wanting expedited installation may opt to contribute to cost‑sharing.
Council members also suggested considering lower residential speed limits (20 mph) in some neighborhoods and exploring federal grants such as Safer Streets for All to fund pedestrian safety measures (crosswalks, sidewalks) that can complement calming efforts.
Wright: "This requires 75% neighborhood support and also requires a review by public safety." Council concern: "That might create a message of inequity for civic leagues that do not carry such a large amount of money in their treasury." City Manager Carter: staff will publish forms and the map on the new city website and will provide the contact information for petitioners.
The council indicated general support to move the draft policy forward with the requested clarifications and staff follow‑up.
