Northfield committee raises fleet maintenance, diagnostics and capital replacement as persistent cost drivers
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
Subcommittee members highlighted high vehicle maintenance costs driven by a mixed fleet and proprietary diagnostics, recommended exploring fleet standardization, and flagged several planned replacements and CIP impacts that will affect maintenance budgets and warranty considerations.
Committee members spent substantial time on highway and fleet costs after reviewing multi-year maintenance trends that showed large variability.
Staff and members described repeated high vehicle maintenance bills tied to a diverse fleet (International, Mack, Western Star, Ford, Dodge) and the expense of sending trucks out of town for proprietary diagnostic reads and warranty work. One example cited a $900 tow to a specialist and a $128 replacement part that sidelined a vehicle for days; members discussed possible savings from fleet standardization and shared diagnostic tools with neighboring communities.
Capital items under consideration include replacement 1-ton trucks (spec price shown at roughly $180,000 if fully specified), outfitting costs for recently purchased trucks, and retention of a rebuilt Western tandem truck for leaf and chloride duties. The committee noted that replacing some vehicles to stay within warranty periods could lower lifetime maintenance costs but would increase near-term capital outlays.
"If you standardize your rolling inventory . . . you can eliminate that technology issue," a member said, urging the subcommittee to examine long-term fleet strategy as part of CIP deliberations. The committee agreed to discuss capital priorities again at the follow-up meeting so that O&M and CIP recommendations align before the budget warning is published.
