Freestone Commissioners review retiree COLA options; no change to 1% flat COLA at meeting

Freestone County Commissioners Court · December 17, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Texas County & District Retirement System (TCRS) representatives outlined the cost and funded‑ratio effects of switching from an already‑approved 1% flat COLA to a 10% CPI‑based COLA; commissioners were told the 1% option would cost about $229,944 overall and the larger CPI option would add roughly $20,817 per year over 15 years; the court took no action to change the prior decision.

Representatives from the Texas County & District Retirement System presented cost estimates and funding impacts for potential cost‑of‑living adjustments for Freestone County retirees.

Greg Ashcroft and Richard (TCRS representatives) explained that a 1% flat COLA across all retirees would cost the county about $229,944 and keep the funded ratio near 90.1%. They said a 10% CPI‑based COLA would increase the liability and reduce the funded ratio below 90%. The presenters noted the unfunded actuarial liability shown in materials as roughly $3,557,003.

Commissioners discussed the tradeoffs between modest, recurring increases (1% flat) and a larger, retroactive CPI‑based boost that would catch up past retirees but increase near‑term budget liabilities. The court discussed funding options, including prefunding or amortizing a COLA over 15 years, and was told that moving to the 10% CPI option would add about $20,817 annually when annualized over 15 years — roughly translating to about $24 per retiree per month on average according to presenters’ calculations.

Because the court had previously approved the 1% flat COLA, members decided not to change that commitment at this meeting; staff and TCRS will remain available for follow‑up actuarial questions.