Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parent Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wenatchee board examines barriers to family engagement and practical outreach ideas
Summary
Tim Shepherd described parent and family engagement as a district problem of practice; board members identified barriers (one‑way communication, language, schedules, tech) and proposed tactics including orientation for families, leveraging school events, employer outreach and incentives.
Get email alerts on the Parent Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tim Shepherd, the district’s director of state and federal programs, presented parent and family engagement as a problem of practice and asked the board for observations and ideas to increase meaningful participation from historically underserved families.
Why it matters: parent and family engagement is embedded in state and federal program requirements and in the district’s Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). Shepherd and board members tied stronger two‑way engagement to improved student outcomes and said the district needs measurable ways to link engagement strategies to learning results.
Barriers identified included reliance on one‑way communication (newsletters, email), language gaps, families’ work schedules, technology access, and low participation among some communities. Board members described examples: a PTO meeting with low turnout contrasted with a fall festival that attracted hundreds of families, illustrating that families attend events but not always traditional meetings.
Ideas and tactics discussed included:
- Using school events (fall festivals, family nights, conferences) as opportunities for targeted engagement rather than expecting families to attend additional meetings. - Offering family‑focused orientation sessions (separate from student orientation) that explain how parents can engage and what questions to ask. - Leveraging older students to motivate family involvement while avoiding using children as translators. - Reaching out to large local employers to distribute information to workers who are parents and exploring compensation or scheduling accommodations for participation where appropriate. - Piloting incentives or targeted follow‑up (for example, phone outreach) to prompt family involvement when initial outreach fails.
Board members also discussed measuring impact. They asked whether attendance could be correlated with assessment results (iReady, Smarter Balanced). Staff said district teams will explore anonymized analyses to study correlations while protecting student privacy and cautioned that statistical relationships may be complex.
Shepherd said the district will pilot additional professional development and data systems to help schools track family engagement and identify successful local practices to scale (he noted examples at Pioneer Middle School and a migrant night that had strong participation). The board agreed this will be part of the district’s work this year but did not take formal action.
What’s next: staff will pursue targeted pilots, professional development and data collection that aim to increase measurable family participation and reduce disparities in engagement across the district.

