Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yukon council narrows short-term rental penalty, approves 1-year probation and HOA language
Summary
The Yukon City Council approved changes to ordinance 14-82 that tighten rules on short-term rentals: an HOA-related clause was retained and the council adopted a one-year probation on reapplication after a violation, with an emergency clause partly enacted.
YUKON, Okla. — The Yukon City Council on Dec. 16 adopted amendments to ordinance 14-82 governing short-term rental licenses, voting to retain language related to homeowners associations and to prohibit reapplication for a defined probation period after a violation.
Vice Mayor Jeff Wooten led an amendment that set a one-year probation period to begin after all fines and fees are paid; during probation, the person who violated the ordinance may not apply for a short-term rental permit. City staff and the city attorney repeatedly cautioned that applications remain discretionary: "The permit is not guaranteed," a city manager interjected during debate.
The council split the ordinance for separate votes. It first approved the HOA-focused paragraph after discussion about whether the city should attempt to interpret or enforce homeowners-association covenants; City Attorney Roger advised the council the proper venue for HOA covenant enforcement is district court, and that the city should make decisions based on ordinance language rather than private covenants.
Public commenters urged the council not to weaken restrictions. Resident Mike Burris told the council, “Don’t water this down,” saying neighbors had petitioned against Airbnbs in their neighborhoods and that residents want "teeth" in the ordinance.
After lengthy discussion about duration and whether the restriction should follow a property or person, the council approved the probation paragraph. Members also voted on an emergency clause to make parts of the ordinance effective immediately; that emergency-clause vote passed with recorded dissent from two members (Shriver and Hillmore).
The ordinance amendments will return as required by law for subsequent steps (planning commission and final readings as applicable) before fully codifying the changes. The city manager and staff emphasized that permits still require planning and council review and are not automatic.
What happens next: the ordinance provisions will proceed per the city's legislative process; staff said fines, permit procedures and exact enforcement steps will be clarified in implementing language and future administrative procedures.
