Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whitfield planning board denies 251‑acre Lake Cathy rezoning after traffic and school capacity concerns
Summary
After hours of public comment raising traffic, school and runoff concerns, the Whitfield County planning board denied a developer’s request to rezone 251 acres on Lake Cathy Road; staff had recommended a smaller R‑3 zoning and noted a 4,100‑foot sewer extension would be required at the developer’s expense.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Whitfield County Planning Board voted to deny a developer’s request to rezone 251 acres on Lake Cathy Road from general agriculture to R‑5, after residents and several commissioners expressed concern about traffic, school impacts and stormwater runoff.
Staff planner Ethan told the board the property lies in an area where growth is converging and recommended R‑3 rather than the requested R‑5 to preserve site‑built single‑family character and to prohibit manufactured homes or duplexes that R‑5 would allow. Ethan also said achieving the density the applicant described would require about a 4,100‑foot extension of sewer, which the developer would have to fund.
Drew Lewis, representing JADC LLC, said the application form misidentified the request as R‑5 and that the company intends an R‑3 plan of single‑family dwellings on lots ranging from about 7,500 to 12,500 square feet with homes of roughly 1,700–2,600 square feet. "It was misrepresented on the application. Is to do single family dwellings," Lewis said, and confirmed the developer would pay for necessary sewer extension.
Residents urged denial. Greg Bates, who lives on Langley Drive, cited traffic estimates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers and said, "If he puts 200 homes, you're looking at 1,800 to 2,200 new vehicle trips per day," warning that Reid Road and the Lake Cathy corridor could not sustain that volume and that the county should expect roughly 100 additional students from such development. Other speakers cited creek and runoff concerns, tree loss and a desire to preserve lower‑density, "country" living.
Board members debated infrastructure and character. Several commissioners said the scale of potential development on 250 acres — estimated in discussion as hundreds of lots if fully developed — would outpace existing road and school capacity north of U.S. 201 and suggested R‑2 or R‑3 zoning might better match surrounding lot sizes. Staff and commissioners also noted that leaving the land in GA would allow a range of agricultural uses, including poultry houses, if an owner chose that path.
A motion to approve the staff recommendation (R‑3) was made and seconded but after debate the formal approval vote failed. The chair recorded the result as a denial (vote recorded in discussion as 3–2 against approval). The board’s denial means the applicant can revise the proposal, pursue a different zoning request, or take the matter to the county commission.
Votes at a glance from the meeting include: a motion to deny an earlier "first‑run" rezoning carried; the Lake Cathy (JADC LLC) rezoning was denied after a split vote; three adjacent hay/agricultural rezones were approved together; several smaller commercial‑to‑residential and spot rezones were approved; and a 31‑lot preliminary plat in Varnell was approved.

