Coos Bay board authorizes negotiations to hire interim superintendent after positive evaluation

Coos Bay School District Board of Education · December 11, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Coos Bay School District board voted to authorize the superintendent and finance director to begin contract negotiations with Interim Superintendent Gary Roberts after reading an initial evaluation that praised his early work and identified areas for follow-up. The motion passed with one board member voting no.

The Coos Bay School District board voted to begin contract negotiations with Interim Superintendent Gary Roberts, authorizing the chair and Finance Director Marina Wright to open talks on a potential superintendent contract.

The decision followed an executive session and a public reading of an initial evaluation the board had prepared. In the evaluation read into the record, board members said "Gary has done a good job at taking the reins from Justin and preserving the overall direction of the district while making his own adjustments," language the chair read aloud as part of the evaluation summary.

Why it matters: the vote signals the board's willingness to pursue a permanent appointment after four months of interim service. Supporters said Roberts has provided stability and responsiveness to board requests; at least one member said a full external search was considered but that district experience and continuity weighed in favor of negotiating.

What the board did: a motion to authorize Marina Wright and the board chair to negotiate a contract passed after debate. Roll-call votes in the transcript show Doctor Rogalski (aye), Mabee (aye), Kevin (no), Arnie (aye), Diane (aye), Kim (aye) and the chair (aye). The motion therefore passed with one dissenting vote.

Board discussion and context: members who supported negotiations cited Roberts's engagement with principals, improved information flows and responsiveness to board data requests. A dissenting vote reflected a desire for broader public input or a formal external search process; board members acknowledged the procedural history of earlier searches and that costs and timelines had shifted since the interim appointment.

Next steps: staff were authorized to begin negotiations; the transcript shows the board intends to return to the public with any contract terms and to continue monitoring performance against superintendent goals reported earlier in the meeting.