Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

LA County water officials propose large first‑year bump in District 29 rates; public hearing set for Dec. 16

Topanga Town Council / Community Meeting · December 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

LA County Waterworks District 29 officials told Topanga residents a proposed five‑year general rate package would fund $190 million in capital needs; staff said the first‑year increase could raise a typical single‑family bill from about $100 to roughly $150 and urged customers to use an online bill calculator. A Prop 218 hearing is scheduled for Dec. 16.

LA County Waterworks District 29 officials on Wednesday outlined a proposed five‑year rate plan that staff said is needed to pay for aging infrastructure, regulatory compliance and planned capital projects.

"The last time we had a general rate increase was actually in 2012," Carolina Fernette, assistant deputy director with Los Angeles County Public Works, told the Topanga community. She said the district’s capital plan calls for roughly $190 million in investment over the next five years, to be funded with a mix of rate revenue, debt and grants.

District staff said the change would alter rate structure as well as unit prices: the proposal removes seasonal rate differences and eliminates a previously embedded 500‑cubic‑foot allowance that had been part of the meter service charge. The quantity charge would move from about $8.68 to $9.26 per 100 cubic feet in January, district staff said. The district estimates a typical single‑family account could see a bill rise from around $100 a month to roughly $150 in year one for some customers.

Residents questioned fairness and affordability. "This is too much all at once," said a resident during the meeting, urging either more gradual increases or alternative funding. Another resident noted that conservation can reduce agency revenue and asked how the district will reconcile conservation goals with revenue needs.

Carolina Fernette and senior civil engineer Bill Johnson said some costs are driven by stricter water‑quality regulation, replacement of aging mains and pump stations, and investments to increase system resiliency (including interconnections and a recently completed 0.5‑million‑gallon tank in Topanga that replaced a 100,000‑gallon tank). Fernette said the district has applied for dozens of grants and has received about $1.2 million toward generator purchases, but that grant funding alone will not cover all capital needs.

The district emphasized public participation under Proposition 218. Staff said the Prop 218 public hearing for District 29 is scheduled for Dec. 16 and that customers may submit written protests; a QR code and a district bill calculator were provided so residents can see how the proposal would affect their bills.

The county stressed that the service (base) charge itself is not changing in the first year; staff said the current service charge is $48.73. Officials encouraged residents to use the posted rate study and the online bill calculator and to submit protests or attend the hearing.

Next steps: the district will accept formal protests under Prop 218 and hold the public hearing on Dec. 16 as announced. Staff also said they will publish detailed line‑item information, FAQs and step‑by‑step instructions for finding billing codes online.