Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Personnel Board approves DPW business administrator job description but declines reclassification

December 23, 2025 | Town of Southborough, Worcester County, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Personnel Board approves DPW business administrator job description but declines reclassification
The Town of Southborough Personnel Board voted Dec. 22 to approve an amended job description for the DPW business administrator, but the independent grading of the revised description did not meet the threshold for reclassification. The board recorded a roll-call vote to approve the job description; because the job description was approved, staff proceeded to the grading step and reported the scoring did not support moving the position to a higher grade.

Bill, the department representative, objected to the grading outcome and requested more transparency in the scoring process, calling it a "proprietary" or "black box" method and asking why scorers were not available to answer questions. He said the result left two similar positions with the same grade despite different day-to-day responsibilities and asked for more information on the scoring methodology. Bill said: "I would like as much information I can get on the scoring process ... I just find it to be a lack of transparency."

Vanessa and Mark explained the town's historical practice: the personnel board uses a consultant tool originating from GovHR (now part of a national company) whose detailed scoring algorithm is proprietary and therefore not released as a public document. Vanessa said members of the board do participate in grading (two board members plus the assistant town administrator score independently) but the underlying tool remains proprietary; she offered to provide additional written explanation to the board and voters.

Why it matters: The grading decision affects a department’s ability to reclassify and to adjust pay within the SAP without additional town-meeting action. Department leaders said differing day-to-day duties between similarly graded positions raise concerns about fairness and transparency. The board agreed to consider additional explanations and to avoid voting on any personnel changes that intersect with active bargaining until contracts are resolved.

Next steps: Staff will prepare supplemental materials explaining the grading timeline and provide a side-by-side of job descriptions before the next Personnel Board meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI