Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents raise property-line questions and allege sanitary sewer project fraud; mayor says records show work completed

Village of Glendale Council · September 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment, residents raised a dispute about property lines at 100 Washington Avenue and alleged the village conspired with a contractor on the Phase 1 sanitary sewer project; the mayor said village records and independent testing indicate the pipes were replaced.

Two residents used the public-comment period to raise concerns about village property records and the Phase 1 sanitary sewer project.

Glenn Parish, who said he recently purchased 100 Washington Avenue and identified himself as a third-generation Glendaleian, asked council about property-line disputes and said he requested surveys from the administrator. He described informal discussions with the CIC and said some village-owned parcels lack surveys.

Kevin Parish later presented photographic documentation and strongly alleged that the village “did conspire with this history for a company,” naming the contractor (identified in his remarks as Instrophone) and stating that project completion documentation submitted to regulators was fraudulent. He said photographs showed pipe left over after the project and claimed the village and contractor misrepresented the extent of pipe replacement; he put the account on the record and asked for investigation.

In his mayoral report, the mayor addressed those comments: "We have records that indicate that those pipes were replaced," and the mayor said a separate company's test supports that the replacements occurred. The mayor also advised the resident that property-line and adverse possession concerns should begin with the village administrator, who would work with legal counsel if needed.

Council did not open a formal investigation during the meeting but indicated records exist that the administration has shared with the resident. The mayor reiterated that disposition of village-owned property requires public bid and that the village does not plan to dispose of 94 Washington at this time.