Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Elections office shows reserves, explains staffing and warns of potential costs for ranked‑choice voting

December 22, 2025 | Cowlitz County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Elections office shows reserves, explains staffing and warns of potential costs for ranked‑choice voting
County finance staff and elections officials reviewed the elections budget monitoring report and explained why current accrual and billing timing affects the year-end picture.

Kathy Funk Baxter, the county's finance director, introduced the elections BMR and described two funds the office manages, including an election reserve used for operating expenses. "This is where the operating expenses are contained," she said while summarizing the account structure and the planned billings to special districts and cities.

A department representative explained that elections captures the entire year's payroll in a thirteenth month and then allocates costs between jurisdictional election activity and maintenance. That timing means some billings are recorded as accruals and staff expected roughly $577,000 of revenue that will post later and push that fund over budget when recorded.

Staff described personnel changes: the office gained a full-time position in October 2024 after a period of understaffing. During the understaffed period the county relied heavily on temporary staffing — a temporary-services line that previously totaled about $182,163 dropped to roughly $26,000 this year as permanent hires replaced temps, while direct-labor costs increased accordingly.

On equipment and capital, staff said a restricted capital reserve receives 15% of charges and is intended to finance larger purchases such as tabulation systems. Officials noted the county's current tabulation vendor lacks ranked-choice-ballot capability and said adding it elsewhere has carried high price tags — one county's charter change required a vendor update that cost roughly $1 million — and warned that implementing ranked-choice voting would require substantial time, funding and public education.

Staff gave a concrete example of replacement hardware costs: about $72,000 reported for two scanners. Commissioners asked clarification questions about billing coverage, accounting entries and whether reserves are sufficient to cover replacement and special projects.

No formal action was taken; staff recommended continued monitoring and posting of accruals and transfers.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI