At an Eastlake City Council meeting, unidentified participants discussed putting a 3.22-acre parcel on a rezoning docket and exchanged estimates for building size and unit counts. Unidentified speaker 1 said the parcel measures "3.22" acres and later urged, "Put it on the rezoning."

The discussion included questions about physical scale. Unidentified speaker 2 asked, "So how tall do you estimate?" and Unidentified speaker 1 responded with a range of figures: "9, 10, 18, 24 feet." Speaker 2 then confirmed the expected number of housing units, asking, "And you're saying 20 to 32 units." The exchange ended without any formal motion, tally, or recorded vote in the provided transcript.

Why it matters: Rezoning decisions determine allowable uses and density on a parcel and can affect neighborhood character, infrastructure demand and future permitting. The figures discussed—3.22 acres, building heights roughly between 9 and 24 feet and a potential 20 to 32 units—are the key inputs local officials would typically use to evaluate impacts such as parking, traffic and services.

What was said and what’s next: Participants did not record a formal motion or vote in the available transcript. Unidentified speaker 1 characterized earlier work as limited, saying that "everything you've done at the midpoint...at this point is just that," suggesting additional review or steps may be pending. The transcript captures an instruction to add the item to rezoning consideration but does not record a scheduled hearing date, formal submittal, or final decision.

The meeting record contained no ordinance numbers, resolutions, or formal action items tied to this parcel in the provided segments. Further procedural steps—public notice, staff analysis, environmental review or a council vote—are not shown in the transcript excerpts.