Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Leander ISD outlines new state instructional‑materials process, estimates $11M available for adoptions
Summary
District curriculum staff told trustees the State Board’s new IMRA/IMRAA process increases the frequency of state adoptions, adds two rubrics for review and creates entitlements ($40/student; extra $20/student for state OER), leaving Leander ISD roughly $11 million available for new instructional materials after recurring costs.
Lauren Meeks, Leander ISD assistant superintendent for curriculum and instruction, told trustees the state is shifting from an eight‑year adoption cycle to a process that can add new materials annually through 2030. She said the new process uses two rubrics — a quality rubric focused on content and a suitability rubric that examines statutes and educational philosophy — and includes public comment and a rejected‑materials list that districts cannot use if a publisher is rejected by the State Board.
Meeks described financial changes created under House Bill 1605: a $40 per‑student entitlement for state‑approved materials and an additional $20 per student for state‑developed open educational resources (OER) such as the state’s "Bluebonnet" resource; the $20 entitlement is "use it or lose it," while the $40 entitlement accumulates if not used. District staff summarized Leander ISD’s IMTA and entitlement funds as an initial approximate allotment of $13,000,000, with recurring costs subtracted to leave about $11,000,000 available to purchase new instructional materials.
Meeks said the district will continue local review and stakeholder engagement, creating selection committees composed of teachers, campus leaders and advisory committees (CACAC and DWIC) to vet candidate materials. Trustees asked for a clear history of past adoption cycles and a timeline of upcoming cycles; Meeks agreed to provide that information in a Friday memo and to bring draft rubrics and implementation plans back to the board in the spring.
No formal adoption was taken at the meeting; the presentation outlined next steps if the State Board releases a cycle list in November.
