Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tif Spending Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Danville redevelopment panel reviews TIF spending plan; invoices approved
Summary
The Danville Redevelopment Commission reviewed a state-required TIF annual spending plan that must be filed with the DLGF by Dec. 1 and approved two invoices; the record shows a motion to approve the spending plan but the final vote on that motion is not recorded in the transcript.
The Danville Redevelopment Commission reviewed its tax-increment financing (TIF) annual spending plan and approved two vendor invoices during its meeting.
Tim Foster of accounting firm Baker Tilly told the commission the spending plan is a state requirement that must be received and placed in council minutes and uploaded to the Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF) Gateway by Dec. 1. "The spending plan is requirement of state. It needs to be submitted before the council before December 1," Foster said. He added the plan does not require itemized line entries and that changes during the year can be reuploaded as a new PDF.
The plan, as presented, lists a $50,000 allocation for professional expenses and a larger capital-expenditure balance described during the meeting as an available capital line (referred to in discussion as a roughly $2,000,000 line available for capital uses). Foster confirmed that the capital balance is meant to be budgeting flexibility for projects in the redevelopment plan rather than a set of final, itemized purchases: "It does not need to be line itemed out."
Staff advised the commission that recording receipt of the plan requires a vote. A motion to approve the spending plan was made at the meeting, but the transcript does not include a recorded final vote on that motion.
Separately, the commission reviewed two invoices in its packet — one described as routine monthly work and another tied to activity on the Winston Center/loan-fund project. Staff reported the town council had recently approved a resolution and promissory-note form establishing the loan-fund agreement and that final documents remain to be signed. Staff said the next meeting will likely include paperwork related to reimbursing the town (the example discussed was reimbursement related to police vehicles, which would then be applied to the town's economic development fund and lent out to a developer).
The commission later moved and seconded to approve both invoices as presented; the motion was carried by voice vote (members responded "Aye") with no opposition recorded in the transcript.
The commission also discussed next steps for the TIF documents: if the commission decides to change the spending plan during 2026 it will need to reupload an updated PDF to the DLGF Gateway. No additional formal actions on the spending plan appear in the available transcript.
Next procedural steps: staff indicated the spending plan file should be added to council minutes and uploaded to the DLGF Gateway by Dec. 1; final loan-fund documents and any reimbursements tied to the Winston Center project were described as forthcoming at a future meeting.
