Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Golf Carts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pryor Creek board delays decision on 60 new golf carts after debate over specs, cost and financing
Summary
The board reviewed two bids for 60 golf carts — a lower-priced club-car bid and a higher-priced Yamaha QuietTech option — and, citing bid-spec inconsistencies and lifecycle questions, voted to take no action pending vendor demonstrations and additional financial analysis.
The Pryor Creek Parks & Recreation Board deferred action on a recommended purchase of 60 new golf carts after extended discussion about specifications, noise levels, lifecycle costs and financing options.
Staff presented two bids: a Clear Creek (Club Car) bid for $237,345 and a Yamaha bid for $312,336. Board members said the Yamaha QuietTech model offers substantially lower in-use noise and different features than the competing bid, making a direct price comparison difficult. "We are not bidding apples to apples," one member said, urging either rebidding or having Yamaha provide a non-QuietTech quote; another member cautioned that altering the bid specs after issuance could undermine procurement integrity.
Members discussed operational tradeoffs — fuel refilling vs. daily charging, battery replacement costs, trade-in values and resale — and the effect cart quality could have on customer experience and course revenue. Staff said the city received roughly $2,700 in trade-in value for existing carts and that the finance quotes for a 48-month lease-purchase vary: Bank of Commerce at 4.25%, RCB at 4.23%, and First Priority at 5.75% (quotes discussed verbally). Board members asked staff to produce apples-to-apples lifecycle cost estimates, including anticipated maintenance and resale values.
To provide an empirical basis for the decision, the board directed staff to invite both vendors to conduct on-site demonstrations (test drives in the parking lot), to brief council members before any award, and to return with refined total-cost-of-ownership figures and clarified bid specifications. The board then voted for "no action" on agenda items 5 (accept a bid) and 6 (finance/lease quote) to allow the additional analysis; staff will schedule vendor demonstrations and bring the item back with supplemental information to support a council decision.
