Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts revised noisemaker policy after debate over scope and enforcement
Summary
The Montville Township Board of Education approved Policy 8870 on noisemakers after a lengthy debate about its breadth and enforceability; one member voted against the policy, arguing it would criminalize ordinary items such as whistles and small speakers.
The Montville Township Board of Education voted to adopt Policy 8870, a revised policy addressing the use and possession of noisemakers at district events, after a protracted discussion about how broadly it would apply.
Board members debated whether the draft was too broad and difficult for building administrators to enforce. Board member Michael Rapoport argued the policy could prohibit commonplace items — "if someone brings their battery powered Bose speaker which is about the size of this water bottle... they're technically in violation of this policy" — and noted that terms such as "formal school function" were not defined. Rapoport moved to remove the policy from the agenda but was advised that procedural rules limited such a motion while another motion was pending.
Supporters said the policy seeks to ensure "school ceremonies and events are conducted in a respectful, safe, and orderly manner" and that athletic events are to be interpreted consistent with NJSIAA guidance on loud, sustained disruptive noises, leaving some discretion to event administrators. The board discussed exempting athletic events from the ban and aligning language with the interscholastic association.
A roll-call vote recorded the following positions on Policy 8870: Missus Zuckerman — Yes; Mister Daughtry — Yes; Doctor Cortellino — Yes; Missus Fano — Yes; Mister Palma — Yes; Mister Petruzzino — Yes; Mister Rapoport — No (he said he opposed Policy 8870 but was "yes to everything else"); Doctor Modrak — Yes. The motion carried by majority recorded vote.
The board did not adopt the broad removal motion; counsel clarified parliamentary options, including laying the matter on the table if members wished to pause consideration. The district will implement the approved policy with the exemptions and procedural discretion discussed at the meeting. The board indicated further refinement and monitoring may follow as administrators apply the policy in practice.
The vote on Policy 8870 was the principal formal action of the meeting; other items discussed at length remained informational or were part of the consent agenda.
