Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves REAP‑funded master plan to study annexing county islands
Summary
The council approved use of REAP funds to prepare a master plan for annexing several county islands and to support housing element rezoning. The item drew debate over sole‑source contracting and the need to go to bid for future general plan work; council later reconsidered a failed motion and approved the item 4–0 with assurances on procurement practices.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council approved an application and contract to use REAP 2 funds to prepare a master plan for annexing county islands and to advance zoning and housing‑element amendments.
Director Warner told the council the master plan would inventory infrastructure needs, evaluate phasing and annexation approaches for seven county islands, and support necessary zoning and housing‑element amendments. Warner said roughly $454,000 was the suballocation for cities; of that, about $85,000 would support rezoning tasks related to the housing element. The master plan must be adopted by 12/31/2026 to meet HCD/STANCOG timelines.
Council debate focused on procurement process and timing. Several council members expressed discomfort with immediately continuing work with an incumbent consultant; staff said time sensitivities made using a firm with existing data more efficient and that the general plan update would be bid through an RFP process when started. A motion initially failed on close votes, then was reconsidered and passed 4–0 after council received commitments to follow competitive bidding for future general plan work.
Warner said annexation timing varies but typical annexation steps (commission, council, LAFCO) take about 12–18 months once initiated, and the master plan is the first step in that process. The grant covers master plan preparation; additional capital improvements for annexation (curb, gutter, sidewalks) and service impacts would be the subject of later discussions and cost‑sharing talks with the county.

