Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norman continues talks on CCEDC contract; council seeks auditability and a one‑year review
Summary
Council continued discussion of entering a contract with the Cleveland County Economic Development Coalition (CCEDC). Staff summarized peer city models; CCEDC offered to allow separate accounting for Norman funds pending board approval; council requested explicit audit language and suggested a one‑year trial with development of internal capacity as a fallback.
City staff returned to a discussion about whether Norman should enter into a contract with the Cleveland County Economic Development Coalition (CCEDC) and provided examples of how neighboring cities structure economic development services and funding.
Staff said some cities run economic development through internal staff and public trusts while others rely on external coalitions funded in part by occupancy/visitor tax revenues. Staff reported that CCEDC contact Lawrence reached out and, pending CCEDC board approval, offered to account for Norman’s funds separately so those dollars could be audited by the city auditor.
Councilors debated whether occupancy/visitor tax was an appropriate funding source for economic development (some argued it is better used for tourism) and asked for clear accounting so Norman could track how its contributions are used. Several councilors said they supported a trial period and wanted the contract to include explicit audit and reporting provisions. One councilor urged the city to develop internal economic development capacity (through Sarah Kaplan’s office or similar) in parallel so the city could pivot if the CCEDC arrangement proved unsatisfactory.
Catherine (city staff) confirmed that auditability language could be included in the contract. Council asked staff to agendize an action item at the next study session or a special session to execute the contract if the contract language is ready and meets the council’s requested transparency terms. No contract execution occurred during this meeting.
