Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

State Water Board staff outline 2025 drinking-water bills; AB 1096, SB 31 and SB 466 shape near-term work

December 24, 2025 | State Water Resources Control Board, Agencies under Office of the Governor, Executive, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

State Water Board staff outline 2025 drinking-water bills; AB 1096, SB 31 and SB 466 shape near-term work
Amanda Simpson, legislative analyst in the Board’s Office of Legislative Affairs, presented the drinking-water bills that reached the governor this year and explained near-term implementation tasks for the State Water Board.

Simpson said AB 1096 (Connolly) — a lead-in-schools bill — requires community water systems to document outreach for lead testing in school and childcare systems, submit the results to the State Water Board and publish data online to improve transparency for parents and communities. She said the board must publish that lead-testing data by June 30, 2028, and that community water systems must update consumer confidence reports by Dec. 31, 2028, to link to the board’s published data.

She described SB 31, which widens where disinfected tertiary recycled water may be used (parks, common areas of residential developments and some food-adjacent facilities) and requires the State Water Board to update Title 22 regulations. Simpson also noted SB 72 will update the California Water Plan and expand advisory participation, and that SB 466 (Caballero) creates liability protections for public water systems implementing board-approved Hexavalent Chromium compliance plans; SB 466 was signed and will take effect in January 2026. A PFAS mitigation-fund bill (SB 454) was vetoed by the governor, who said it was premature to create a fund without a dedicated funding source.

Ending: Simpson offered to follow up on questions about budget-trailer bills and implementation details not in her portfolio; staff encouraged advisory members to send follow-up questions to the Office of Legislative Affairs.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal