Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Monticello council approves property tax levy and special‑service-area levies; grocery‑tax change fails
Summary
The council approved the FY2026 property tax levy (4.9% estimated increase) and levies for three special service areas. A municipal grocery/service occupation tax (ordinance 2025-63) failed after a tie; the consent agenda and routine motions were approved.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monticello’s City Council on Nov. 24 approved the FY2026 property tax levy and levy assessments for three special service areas while rejecting a proposed municipal grocery/service occupation tax.
Council approved ordinance 2025-77, the property tax levy for fiscal year 2026; staff said the draft levy increases property‑tax revenues by an estimated 4.9% compared with the prior year. The council also approved ordinances 2025-78, 2025-79 and 2025-80 to levy assessments for Special Service Areas 3 (Sage Meadows), 4 (Walden Pond) and 5 (Dancing Acres), measures staff described as tools to incentivize development.
Council debated ordinance 2025-63, which would have implemented a municipal grocery retailers occupation tax and a municipal grocery service occupation tax. Staff and members said available data do not cleanly break out eligible grocery items from general sales tax collections; estimates mentioned in the discussion ranged from a conservative $50,000 to as high as $200,000–$300,000 in potential revenue, though staff said precise figures were not available. After roll call the motion failed (transcript records a tie and the mayor voting no), so the grocery/service occupation tax change was not approved.
Other routine business: the consent agenda (claims, minutes and reports) was approved by roll-call vote, and the council authorized the mayor to participate remotely due to health reasons after a successful procedural motion. The meeting concluded after the police chief gave a brief public-safety update and staff previewed parade traffic adjustments.
What’s next: The levy ordinances take effect per the council actions taken at the meeting; staff indicated they will monitor revenue outcomes for the grocery/tax issue and that the special service area levies are intended to support near‑term development incentives.

