Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ada Transition Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kern County hears $600M‑plus ADA transition plan and staff seeks board approval
Summary
County staff and consultant Bureau Veritas presented a Title II ADA self‑assessment and draft 20‑year transition plan, estimating roughly $138 million to fix county buildings and parks and $462 million for pedestrian facilities; a motion to approve the plan was made but the transcript does not record a final vote in the provided segments.
Get email alerts on the Ada Transition Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kern County officials on Tuesday reviewed a draft Americans with Disabilities Act (Title II) self‑assessment and a proposed 20‑year transition plan that lays out priorities and estimated costs to remove barriers across county buildings, parks and public rights of way.
Eric Nesbitt of the county administrator’s office told the Board of Supervisors the plan is intended to capture access problems, prioritize fixes and establish a multi‑year framework that can be updated as needs change. "The assessment and transition plan process is required as part of the Americans with Disabilities Act," Nesbitt said, and the county will seek public input as it moves to implementation.
Philip Smith, a certified access specialist with consultant Bureau Veritas, said assessors conducted nearly 300 site evaluations and that an online outreach survey produced 129 responses. He presented the report’s headline cost estimates: "For just our buildings, parks, facilities, the estimated costs for barrier removal is $138,000,000," and "for our public rights of way which includes our roads and sidewalks, it's an even bigger number $462,000,000." Smith said remediation would be phased over 20 fiscal years, with higher‑priority sites addressed first and the inventory integrated into the county’s GIS for tracking.
The transition plan divides work into phases (parks, libraries and administration facilities prioritized earlier; correctional facilities and employee‑only areas later) and includes proposed policy and training changes for county employees. Nesbitt said some costs will be incorporated into the annual budget process and that the plan is a "living document" that will be updated as conditions and priorities evolve.
Supervisor Couch moved to adopt the staff recommendation; Supervisor Parlier seconded the motion. The provided transcript segments record the motion and second but do not include a recorded vote tally in those excerpts.
The plan’s large cost estimates and the long, phased timetable mean implementation will require ongoing budget decisions and coordination across departments. The county said public outreach results and detailed appendices are part of the draft transition plan available for review.
Next steps recorded in the meeting transcript: the board moved the staff recommendation (moved by Supervisor Couch, seconded by Supervisor Parlier); the transcript does not record the final vote result in the supplied segments.

