Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation White Lane 709 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kern LAFCO approves Bakersfield 'White Lane' annexation 4–3 amid concerns about outreach and fee guarantees
Summary
Kern County LAFCO voted 4–3 to approve Annexation 709 (White Lane No.9) to the City of Bakersfield and to proceed without a protest hearing, despite commissioners and residents raising questions about outreach completeness and uncertainty over who would pay sewer connection fees.
Kern County Local Agency Formation Commission approved Annexation 709 (White Lane No. 9) — a proposed 111.33-acre annexation into the City of Bakersfield intended to extend sewer and water services — by a 4–3 roll-call vote after debate over outreach and the financial responsibility for sewer connections.
Executive Officer Knox introduced the proposal, noting the area is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community and that Self Help Enterprises initiated the annexation on behalf of residents seeking sewer service. Knox described aging septic systems and said the project has been in staff review for about four years. He recommended approval subject to a mitigated negative declaration and standard conditions but did not recommend waiving a protest hearing without confirming there were no protests.
Members of the public and staff from the City of Bakersfield and Self Help described outreach efforts and potential cost arrangements. City planner Azid Aluguri told commissioners that "taxes don't change" because taxes are collected by the county, and that connection fees exist but can be divided into 12 monthly installments. Self Help's Oscar Cisneros said that in some disadvantaged-community projects construction funding has covered connection fees and septic abandonment, though he could not guarantee the same here because a final funding agreement had not been executed.
Several commissioners and a resident, Leticia Curiel, emphasized failing septic conditions and support for sewer hookups. Other commissioners pressed staff on the scope of outreach (staff surveyed about 120 of roughly 207 parcels and mailed MND notices to all property owners, with some returned) and on whether residents were informed that connection fees might not be waived. Commissioner Fowler said incomplete outreach and "murky information" warranted a protest hearing; Fowler said she would vote against proceeding without one. Nevertheless, when the motion to proceed without a protest hearing was called and seconded, the roll-call vote concluded 4 ayes and 3 noes and the motion passed.
The commission recorded the outcome and directed staff to implement the annexation subject to the conditions in the staff report. Several commissioners said they expect continued grant applications and outreach as the project moves toward construction.
