Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater Taxroll topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riviera Beach council pulls plan to move stormwater, trash fees to tax bill after resident-impact concerns

Riviera Beach City Council · December 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff proposed notifying Palm Beach County to put stormwater and solid-waste charges on the property tax bill beginning in 2027; councilmembers raised concerns about tax liens, foreclosure risk and impact on renters and homeowners and voted to remove the items for further public workshops and outreach.

Riviera Beach city staff presented a package of agreements and resolutions intended to give the county notice of the city’s intent to move stormwater and solid‑waste charges from monthly utility bills onto the property tax roll beginning in fiscal 2027. Chief Financial Officer Randy Sherman said the change would not increase fees but would change how they are billed, potentially lowering utility deposits and reducing the city’s banking fees.

"This doesn't kick in until 2027," Sherman said, framing the action as an administrative step to allow implementation in time for the 2027 tax bills. He told the council the move could lower monthly utility payments and reduce transaction charges the city now absorbs.

Several councilmembers pushed back, saying the shift could have unintended consequences for low‑income residents. "This process here is gonna set some of our residents up for tax liens and potential foreclosures," Councilperson Bruce Guyton said, warning that putting utility charges on the tax bill can lead to liens and escalate mortgage escrow obligations for homeowners.

Other members echoed concerns that landlords might pass the charge through as higher rent, and that seniors and fixed‑income households could face difficulty paying a larger annual tax bill. Council discussion focused on the need for more data and community outreach: members asked for clearer estimates of affected households, the interplay with existing rental assistance and the county’s early‑payment discounts, and whether the change would in practice improve access to assistance programs.

Rather than vote on the resolutions, the council voted to pull the related consent and regular-agenda items (3c–3f) and directed staff to organize public workshops and provide detailed impact analyses before taking a final vote. Finance staff said they would provide the requested numbers and that any final decision would be made during the city’s budget process.

Next steps: staff will schedule community meetings and return with detailed fiscal impacts and mitigation options before the city moves forward with any change to billing method.