Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Keller Associates recommends Site 2 as top choice for St. Helens reservoir; council raises wetlands and neighborhood concerns

December 18, 2025 | St. Helens, Columbia County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Keller Associates recommends Site 2 as top choice for St. Helens reservoir; council raises wetlands and neighborhood concerns
Keller Associates briefed the St. Helens city council on a reservoir siting study on Dec. 17, describing a multi‑phase evaluation that narrowed 11 initial locations to four finalists and ultimately recommended Site 2 based on cost, constructability and system connection length.

Consultant Alexis said the selection considered hydraulic pressure zones, pipeline connections, overflow/drain routing and geotechnical constraints. Field borings and lab testing showed basalt at Site 2 — a geologic condition the team described as favorable for building a large water tank — while Site 4 had more challenging geologic conditions and Site 3 ranked lower on constructability concerns.

The consultants also reported environmental and permitting findings: Sites 2 and 4 contain documented wetlands and the team recommended habitat assessments and coordination with permitting agencies (Army Corps, Department of State Lands) as mitigation steps. The consultants stated they had found no ‘‘fatal flaws’’ among the four alternatives but noted Sites 1 and 4 present more hydraulic transmission issues requiring upsized pipelines (recommended 24‑inch transmission lines in some alignments).

Councilors acknowledged those tradeoffs. One councilor said the city’s history of building in wetlands raised concern about mitigation, traffic impacts from construction trucks in residential areas and the potential for prolonged permitting timelines. Another councilor emphasized seismic and structural stability, supporting Site 2’s higher ranking because it reduces liquefaction and foundation risks.

Keller Associates outlined next steps: finalize the siting study, present the final report to council in January, begin property‑acquisition discussions for the preferred site and work in parallel on funding and design. Consultants and staff said additional geotechnical and permitting work will be required before any property acquisition or formal council land‑use decisions.

The presentation did not result in a binding decision; councilors directed staff to return with the final study and funding analysis in January for further direction.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI