Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Catch And Release Injury topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears evidence of hook‑injury scores elsewhere; Utah shows limited but notable hook‑scarring
Summary
Members discussed a published 'hooking injury' scale after a circulated article about population-level harm on a heavily fished stretch; DWR staff said Utah sampling finds hook scarring in some rivers (Green River ~13% with minor damage) but no clear population-level declines yet; members encouraged targeted monitoring and angler education.
A council member circulated an article titled (paraphrased) about a hooking‑injury scale and high rates of injury on a heavily fished stretch. The member asked whether Utah has observed similar damage.
Trina Hedrick, the DWR cold‑water sport fish coordinator, said DWR routinely looks for hook scarring during electrofishing and dye‑mark examinations. She reported that on the Green River around fall electrofishing, staff found roughly 13% of fish with some form of physical damage (primarily in the mid scoring range), but that Utah has not observed the extreme, population‑level reproductive impacts described in the article shared from another jurisdiction.
Council members described local anecdotal observations at reservoirs (dead fish on the shoreline and fish tethered to hooks) and noted illegal baiting and harvest as enforcement concerns. Staff recommended expanding systematic monitoring (including standardized injury scoring where feasible), looking at trends over time (fish per mile and population indices) and using outreach to encourage responsible handling and selective harvest where appropriate.
No formal regulatory changes were proposed during the meeting; staff said they would incorporate injury checks into routine sampling where possible and report trends to the council.
