Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press city on affordability and past $42 charge; staff say liens are collection tool, not water shutoff policy
Summary
During an open house on utility rates, residents recalled a prior $42 general services fee and expressed fear of liens or shutoffs; staff said that particular $42 proposal did not pass and explained collection procedures and protections, while urging public participation in upcoming council review and budget hearings.
A sizable portion of the public‑comment portion focused on affordability and collection practices after staff proposed phased utility rate increases at a St. Helens open house.
Multiple residents recounted prior council discussions in which a $42 monthly “general services” charge was referenced and said they were told nonpayment could lead to liens on homes. One attendee said the prospect of an extra $42 a month would be unaffordable for many and described being told a lien could be placed on a house for unpaid general service charges.
City staff and the consultant responded that the $42 general services fee referenced by residents did not pass the council and clarified how collections typically work. A staff member identified in the meeting as the finance director (referred to by a resident as Gloria; staff confirmed the finance director role) explained that, depending on the charge and collection procedures, the city uses options such as payment plans and liens for unpaid municipal debts; staff told the audience that placing a lien is a separate legal remedy and not equivalent to automatic termination of water service.
Staff urged residents to participate in the budget and council process — Donovan said his presentation was a recommendation to the council and the ultimate authority rests with elected council members and the budget/resolution schedule. Residents said they will pursue petitions or other political actions if they oppose the proposed increases.
Quote: "If we can't afford the extra $42 a month on our water bill, are you going to shut off our water basically?...they said, well, then we'll just slap a lien on your house," a resident said; staff responded that the specific $42 charge did not pass and collection tools include liens but that the council will determine final policy.
What happens next: Staff asked residents to submit comment cards or written questions; staff said the consultant will present the recommendation to council in a work session and the budget cycle will provide additional opportunities for public input before any rate resolution is adopted.
