Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ss4a Grant topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff: $300,000 SS4A planning grant will fund evaluations, not construction

Anniston City Council · December 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff told the council the $300,000 Safe Streets and Roads for All planning grant will fund safety evaluations and engineering recommendations across the city; a volunteer committee including county and city representatives will guide the planning but construction funding is separate and not included in the award.

City staff described a $300,000 planning grant under the federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program that will pay for problem‑area evaluations and engineering recommendations, but will not fund construction.

An unidentified staff member (Speaker 5) said the county invited the city to support an SS4A grant application and the two governments selected the same consultant to administer the planning work. "So the award is for $300,000 and that that covers the recommendation evaluation of those areas. It does not cover the actual correction of those areas," Speaker 5 said.

Speaker 5 explained the planning process will assess traffic‑safety problems—examples cited included repeated run‑off at a curve or areas with stacking and vehicle collisions—then produce an engineering packet the city can use to pursue implementation funding. The committee will include county staff, city staff, consultants, two county commissioners and two council members (the mayor and one council member), Speaker 5 said; participation was described as volunteer rather than a formal appointment.

Council members asked whether a formal resolution was needed to accept or participate in the honorary street aspect of another item; a separate staff speaker (Speaker 6) said the honorary street program is primarily a green‑sign designation and should not require changes to 911 records or street names, so no council vote was expected for that element.

No action to accept or obligate construction funds was recorded; staff said future work items would return to the council if implementation funding is sought.