This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
Humboldt County officials approved Resolution 2025-12-15 on Dec. 15, waiving the county's right to appeal the Humboldt 23 application so the operator can proceed with a previously approved non-construction expansion at Site 23.
An unidentified board member introduced the resolution, saying the applicant wanted to begin work before the 14-day appeal window had closed. "We're waiving our right to appeal," said an unidentified speaker who summarized the staff recommendation and the applicant's request. Board members moved to approve the resolution for Site 23; the motion was seconded and the chair called for a vote. Several board members voiced "aye" and the motion was carried.
The expansion was described in the meeting as adding roughly 500 head of livestock under the farm's existing permit classification. Participants noted this was a non-construction change to an operation the board already approved the previous week.
Other actions recorded during the same meeting included a vote to formally appoint Ben Ulrich to the Midas executive board and a motion to reinstate a resident's homestead credit; both were approved by the board by voice vote. The homestead reinstatement was handled after the resident produced identification and a motion to reinstate the credit carried.
The resolution does not itself change permit conditions; it waives the county's procedural right to file an appeal within the statutory window, allowing the applicant to proceed to whatever next step is required under state and local permitting processes. The board noted that planning and zoning is still working on an updated comprehensive plan and related zoning ordinance work that could address wind-energy and other land-use concerns.
The exact roll-call tally for Resolution 2025-12-15 was not specified during the meeting; the chair declared the motion carried after members voiced their support. The county did not provide additional written materials during the meeting detailing the operator's timeline for Site 23 work; planning staff indicated they will continue to coordinate with the applicant and with the planning and zoning board as appropriate.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,017 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit