Brentwood board pauses River Run land‑use‑change tax decision, asks legal counsel and to invite developer

Brentwood Select Board · December 30, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Select Board voted to reconsider a prior vote on a land-use-change tax for the River Run development (36.62 acres / phase 2) after members raised valuation concerns and cited an August 2023 developer email; the board asked legal counsel for an opinion and agreed to invite the developer to discuss the matter.

The Brentwood Select Board on Dec. 30 moved to reconsider a prior decision about the land‑use‑change tax for phase 2 of the River Run development at 41A Mill Road and directed staff to obtain a legal opinion before taking final action.

Adrienne Summers, the town's contract assessor, presented an assessment for 36.62 acres of land coming out of current use with a raw-land market value of $1,500,000; she calculated a 10% land‑use‑change tax of $150,000. Board members said the developer had previously described a unit-release figure to the town, and one document read into the record showed the developer (Joe Falzone) had said, in an August 2023 email, that "Phase 2 and 3 will have the same terms for unit release in the amount of $5,000 and at some future date, if there are substantial market value changes, the release figure may have to be revisited." The board debated whether that email — and communications by the prior assessor — constituted a binding agreement.

Several board members said that the developer's apparent per‑unit figures and local revaluation data suggested higher residual/retail values for units in the development (board members discussed revaluation figures around $250,000 per unit), and they worried that accepting the lower figure would forgo significant town revenue. "That doesn't seem fair to the taxpayers that a developer gets such a special deal," one member said during the discussion.

Members agreed they needed a formal legal review to determine whether the prior assessor's communications created a binding obligation and whether the town must follow the per‑unit release already discussed. The board voted to reconsider its Dec. 9 action on the phase‑2 terms and to table final approval pending counsel's opinion and a future discussion with the developer. Assessor Summers said staff would also review property and permit records to confirm when roads or infrastructure triggered current‑use removal.

Next steps include obtaining a written opinion from town counsel and convening a follow‑up meeting with the developer only after legal counsel has reviewed the prior communications and the factual record. The board set an internal target of April 1, 2026, as a timeline reference for related assessments and follow-up action.