Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Brentwood board pauses River Run land‑use‑change tax decision, asks legal counsel and to invite developer

December 30, 2025 | Brentwood Town, Rockingham County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Brentwood board pauses River Run land‑use‑change tax decision, asks legal counsel and to invite developer
The Brentwood Select Board on Dec. 30 moved to reconsider a prior decision about the land‑use‑change tax for phase 2 of the River Run development at 41A Mill Road and directed staff to obtain a legal opinion before taking final action.

Adrienne Summers, the town's contract assessor, presented an assessment for 36.62 acres of land coming out of current use with a raw-land market value of $1,500,000; she calculated a 10% land‑use‑change tax of $150,000. Board members said the developer had previously described a unit-release figure to the town, and one document read into the record showed the developer (Joe Falzone) had said, in an August 2023 email, that "Phase 2 and 3 will have the same terms for unit release in the amount of $5,000 and at some future date, if there are substantial market value changes, the release figure may have to be revisited." The board debated whether that email — and communications by the prior assessor — constituted a binding agreement.

Several board members said that the developer's apparent per‑unit figures and local revaluation data suggested higher residual/retail values for units in the development (board members discussed revaluation figures around $250,000 per unit), and they worried that accepting the lower figure would forgo significant town revenue. "That doesn't seem fair to the taxpayers that a developer gets such a special deal," one member said during the discussion.

Members agreed they needed a formal legal review to determine whether the prior assessor's communications created a binding obligation and whether the town must follow the per‑unit release already discussed. The board voted to reconsider its Dec. 9 action on the phase‑2 terms and to table final approval pending counsel's opinion and a future discussion with the developer. Assessor Summers said staff would also review property and permit records to confirm when roads or infrastructure triggered current‑use removal.

Next steps include obtaining a written opinion from town counsel and convening a follow‑up meeting with the developer only after legal counsel has reviewed the prior communications and the factual record. The board set an internal target of April 1, 2026, as a timeline reference for related assessments and follow-up action.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI