Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Selectmen review memo alleging buffer violation by Loudon Sand & Gravel at Lockwood and Winmore site
Summary
Board reviewed a chief's memo saying a field survey found the vegetative buffer at the Lockwood and Winmore property is not in compliance and discussed next steps, including sending a courtesy letter or referring the matter to the town attorney.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Loudon Board of Selectmen on Dec. 3 reviewed a memo from Chief Blanchett that, according to a board member, reported a field survey and fire‑department inspection indicating that Loudon Sand & Gravel had altered or removed a required vegetative buffer at the Lockwood and Winmore property.
Board members said the town's measurements show the buffer is smaller than the 50‑foot vegetative buffer required by state statute, and they discussed whether to ask the landowner or operator to restore the buffer or to involve the town attorney. One board member said the survey and the fire chief's walk‑through show a violation and recommended contacting legal counsel to preserve the town's options; another suggested first sending a letter asking the company to remedy specific issues and returning to the attorney only if the company declines.
Members noted the town's zoning ordinance had recently been amended to clarify buffer language (previously interpreted as a side‑lot buffer rather than a rear‑lot buffer), but that the work at the site happened before that amendment and still appears to contravene the state requirement. Board members said restoring the vegetative buffer would likely take years to reestablish plantings, but is feasible and less costly if the operator agrees to cooperate.
No formal enforcement action was taken at the meeting. The board directed that a member visit the site and attempt to speak with the operator; if the operator refuses to comply, members said the town attorney would be asked for the next course of action. The board also noted the value of documenting property lines with a survey before pursuing legal steps.
The matter remains under discussion; the board did not vote to initiate litigation or an enforcement order at the Dec. 3 meeting.

