Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning Bonanza Creek topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission approves rezoning for 297.853‑acre Bonanza Creek Ranch parcel

Santa Fe County Planning Commission · November 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a zoning map amendment for Bonanza Creek Ranch LLC to split a 297.853‑acre parcel into commercial general, industrial general, residential community and mixed‑use districts, subject to staff conditions; staff and the applicant said county water and sewer are available and a water budget and traffic studies will be updated phase by phase.

The Santa Fe County Planning Commission voted Nov. 20 to approve a zoning map amendment for a 297.853‑acre parcel known as Bonanza Creek Ranch (Case 25‑51‑70), allowing approximately 80 acres of commercial general, 54 acres of industrial general, 69 acres of residential community and 94 acres to remain mixed use.

Destiny Romero, building and development review specialist senior for Santa Fe County, told the commission the hearing officer recommended approval on Oct. 9, 2025 and that staff found the application in compliance with SLDC subdivision design standards; staff entered proposed conditions into the record and recommended approval. Romero confirmed the applicant supplied exhibits showing a pre‑application neighborhood meeting and that a hearing officer recommended order is included in the packet.

Jennifer Jenkins of Jenkins Gavin, representing Bonanza Creek Ranch and the Hughes family, said the parcel benefits from adjacent county water and sewer infrastructure (a force main and the Bay Vista lift station) and multiple access options along State Highway 14 and a connector to the I‑25 frontage road. Jenkins described a conceptual zoning plan responsive to neighboring land uses and said the applicant prepared a land‑use program that informed an initial traffic impact analysis and a preliminary water budget. "This property is just under 300 acres," Jenkins said, "and it really benefits from significant utility infrastructure that if it's not on the property, it is directly adjacent to the property."

The applicant reported an initial conceptual water budget of about 237 acre‑feet per year for the entire project; Jenkins and the applicant's engineering team said phase‑specific water budgets and legally binding line‑extension agreements with the county will be submitted with each subdivision phase and water rights must be secured before preliminary plats. Jenkins also said the SLDC requires a 30% open space dedication (approximately 89 acres) and that the development will preserve floodplain corridors and connect open space and trails.

Traffic consultant Michael Gomez said intersection analyses indicate generally acceptable levels of service to 2040 except at the New Mexico 14/Valle Vista intersection, which currently fails; Gomez said the New Mexico Department of Transportation will determine appropriate mitigation and that the applicant has discussed potential improvements, including turn lanes and future signalization when warranted.

Commissioners asked about the substance of neighborhood meeting notes (Romero confirmed five attendees and that notes were supplied but did not make it into the packet), conditional uses associated with industrial general zoning, the project's anticipated market‑driven phasing and a five‑year conceptual plan expiration provision in the SLDC. The applicant said they expect to file a first subdivision phase in mid‑2026 and to complete buildout by about 2040, depending on market conditions, and noted that the conceptual plan automatically extends as subdivisions and development proceed.

Commissioner (speaker 8) moved to approve the rezoning including staff conditions; Commissioner Brugger seconded. The commission approved the rezoning by voice vote; the transcript records the motion and affirmative voice votes but does not provide an itemized roll call or vote tally. The case will move to the Board of County Commissioners for final action per the county review process.