Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Warrant Scheduling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board schedules multiple warrant articles and petition Base Hill rezone for December hearings
Summary
On Nov. 20 the Swansea Planning Board placed amendments 2–8 and the Wetlands Conservation District amendment on the Dec. 4 public hearing agenda and scheduled the petitioned Base Hill Road rezoning for the Dec. 18 meeting; members also discussed screening, enforcement, master-plan updates and a possible town bond for affordable housing.
Get email alerts on the Warrant Scheduling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Swansea Planning Board on Nov. 20 scheduled several warrant-article public hearings and a petitioned zoning amendment. The board voted to bring warrant amendments numbered 2 through 8 to a Dec. 4 public hearing (motion by Michael York, seconded by Victoria Ames) and scheduled the petitioned Base Hill Road rezoning amendment for a Dec. 18 public hearing (motion by Victoria Ames, seconded by Brandon Self).
Members said amendments 2–8 and the Wetlands Conservation District amendment were not expected to take long and could fit on the Dec. 4 agenda. The petitioner for the Base Hill Road amendment confirmed the petition had already been submitted and that the board should place the item on the Dec. 18 agenda for a hearing.
Beyond scheduling, the board discussed several planning priorities: when to require screening (landscape buffers and fencing) for commercial-to-residential transitions, enforcement mechanisms for longstanding site-plan or blight issues (noting that code enforcement and the selectmen handle enforcement under RSA), whether to update portions of the 2022 Master Plan (housing section suggested), and a recently discussed Selectmen proposal for a roughly $500,000 bond to support low-income housing. One member warned of using taxpayer money to support private enterprise without clear community benefit; staff noted the town’s role may be limited to providing letters of support and not bearing financial responsibility.
The board also reviewed scheduling logistics and statutory deadlines for first and potential second public hearings, noting the board has flexibility to continue items into early January if hearings run long or substantial changes are proposed.

