Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Addresses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carmel council adopts first-reading ordinance to create standard street-address system
Summary
Council introduced an ordinance to align Carmel-by-the-Sea’s municipal code with California building standards and implement a new, pattern-based addressing system; staff plans a staged rollout with county and USPS updates beginning early 2026.
Get email alerts on the Addresses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Carmel-by-the-Sea City Council on Dec. 2 introduced an ordinance to establish a standard street-address system and amend municipal code to reflect California building‑code address-identification requirements.
City staff and the addressing committee presented a data-driven numbering plan anchored to the city’s numbered streets and a consistent odd/even pattern. Mayor Pro Tem Delves described the design principle as a pattern that improves findability for delivery and first responders: “A good address system is one that offers a reliable pattern,” he said, and staff emphasized that the Address Management System used by USPS and the county will be the authoritative repository.
Staff outlined an implementation timeline: city compilation of APN-to-address data targeted by Dec. 31, 2025; county review and dataset integration estimated in Jan–Mar 2026; a USPS AMS batch update (the AMS manager estimated about one week) in April 2026; followed by utility and commercial map updates (April–May 2026). Staff proposed a staged test — an initial 25-address batch — to surface exceptions before a full update.
Council members asked detailed questions about corner lots, parcels that cross jurisdictional lines, properties with multiple APNs, private driveways and how exceptions would be handled. Staff said the city would publish testing tools and an interactive map for residents to preview assigned addresses and would implement a one‑page address‑change request process to correct errors discovered after rollout.
Council moved to waive further reading and introduce Ordinance 20 25 006, amending Section 15.55.0.1 for address identification. A roll‑call vote was unanimous; the ordinance returns for a second reading on Jan. 13. Council and staff stressed outreach, targeted “office hours” and staged communications to help residents and service providers adapt without disruption.
Staff emphasized that an AMS update does not equate to door‑to‑door mail delivery but would make addresses verifiable in national systems and ease interactions with utilities, emergency services and mapping providers.

