Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lincoln council debates cap and enforcement changes to multi-pet ordinance
Summary
Council members debated capping household pets (proposals ranged from 4 to 6), enforcement mechanisms and publicity of the existing multi-pet license. Members directed staff to draft changes and consider outreach and a public survey to collect resident input.
Lincoln City Council members spent a major portion of the Dec. 1 meeting discussing possible changes to the city's multi-pet ordinance, including whether to cap the number of household pets without a license and how to strengthen enforcement.
Alderman Bateman said his proposal would cap the number of household pets at four and require a state-licensed breeder permit for anyone who wants to keep more than four: "Caps it at 4. And if you have more than 4, you would have to have a state licensed breeders permit," he said during the discussion. Bateman said the measure was motivated by multiple citizen complaints about properties with large numbers of animals and concerns about animal health and public safety.
Other council members pushed back on a four-pet cap. Alderman Downs said he preferred adding "more teeth" to the current ordinance and noted many residents were unaware an existing multi-pet license option exists; he supported a higher cap, saying, "I think that 6 is a very I think that 6 is a manageable number." Alderman Parrott and others asked questions about the difference between a multi-pet owner and a commercial breeder, and whether spatial requirements or exemptions (for life events) should be built into any change.
Public comments and staff input emphasized enforcement concerns: officials noted animal hoarding and failure to vaccinate as drivers for revision, and council members asked how the city would detect and enforce limits. Suggestions included increasing fines for failure to vaccinate, publicizing the existing ordinance to improve compliance, conducting a resident survey to estimate pet ownership, and drafting exception language for life events (for example, when two households combine).
The council directed Alderman Bateman to work with city staff (including Mister Hobblett) on proposed ordinance language and outreach. No formal ordinance vote or final cap was taken at the meeting; members discussed compromise options (4, 5, or 6) and next steps for staff to return with draft language and additional information.
