Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veterinary Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Soledad panel approves downtown zoning change to allow small‑scale veterinary services
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 3‑0 to recommend a downtown zoning amendment that separates veterinary clinics from animal boarding and allows limited outpatient veterinary services in parts of the downtown core to address a local service gap left after the town’s clinic closed.
SOLEDAD, Calif. — The Soledad Planning Commission on Nov. 20 recommended that the City Council adopt a zoning text amendment to allow small‑scale, appointment‑based veterinary services in parts of the downtown core.
Senior Planner Ariana Mora said the change responds to a service gap after the closure of the town’s only veterinary clinic, identified in staff materials as Los Coches Animals on Nestles Road, which has forced many residents to travel to Salinas for pet care. "By proposing these amendments, we have a clear land use distinction for veterinary related services and expand opportunities for small scale appointment based veterinary care in downtown Soledad," Mora said.
The amendment separates "veterinary clinic" and "veterinary services" in the Downtown Specific Plan. Staff defined a veterinary clinic as a higher‑intensity medical establishment that may include overnight observation, surgical suites and boarding; those clinics remain prohibited in the downtown core. "Veterinary services," by contrast, are limited outpatient services — wellness exams, vaccinations and limited surgical procedures such as spay/neuter — without overnight boarding or outdoor kennels, and would be allowed in designated downtown districts subject to a Minor Use Permit (MUP) or, in some pedestrian‑adjacent locations nearer residences, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
Staff said animal boarding and daycare remain identified separately and generally prohibited in the downtown core to minimize noise and other impacts. The amendment would allow veterinary services as an MUP in core and edge districts and as a CUP where residential proximity raises potential impacts.
On environmental review staff concluded the amendment qualifies for categorical exemption per CEQA guidelines cited in the presentation (transcript references sections 15303 and 15061) because the change regulates allowable land uses and does not itself authorize a project with new environmental impacts.
Commissioners asked whether the downtown services would be limited to household pets; staff clarified the intent is to permit household animals (for example, cats, dogs and common household pets) and not farm animals. Commissioners also discussed operational limits (appointment‑only or patient caps) to avoid downtown traffic pressures.
A motion to approve Resolution 2025‑11 — with clarifying language specifying "household pets" — passed 3‑0 with two commissioners absent. The Planning Commission will forward its recommendation to City Council for review and final action.
