Key West HARC approves multiple renovation and accessory‑structure projects; staff to draft rainbow‑fence guidance
Loading...
Summary
At its Nov. 18 meeting the Historic Architecture Review Commission approved several accessory‑structure and renovation projects across the historic district and directed staff to draft guidance on limited fence painting after lengthy debate about ‘‘rainbow’’ pickets and the Certificate of Appropriateness process.
The Historic Architecture Review Commission of the City of Key West on Nov. 18 approved a string of renovation and accessory‑structure applications and instructed staff to prepare an action item on painted fence sections after a broad policy discussion.
Commissioners voted to approve an updated design for a rear accessory structure at 1410 Olivia Street, citing a reduced height and the structure’s 1'2" setback from the main house. Applicant Serge Mashtakoff said the team had "worked a little bit" on rooflines and maintained a gable form that the commission found acceptable; the measure passed unanimously.
The commission also approved a new one‑story residence at 906 William Street that includes a rear pool, an ADA lift integrated into the front porch and an array of 18 roof‑mounted solar panels. Planner Daniella told commissioners the 22‑foot‑6‑inch building height is consistent with nearby structures and staff found the design compatible.
At 917 Center Street the board approved a rear addition and small accessory structure after staff and the applicant agreed the proposed addition would be inset with a lower roofline to differentiate it from the historic fabric. Commissioners specifically debated whether the demolition of a small rear wall should require two readings; staff and the applicant said construction would be accomplished by "over‑framing" the existing sheathing, and the commission authorized a single reading for the de minimis demolition portion.
A multi‑component renovation that includes a new pool house and modifications to a contributing structure was approved with a condition that the side entry porch be lowered and that staff coordinate final door and window dimensions with the applicant. Commissioners expressed concern about side fenestration and asked the applicant to work with staff to avoid an out‑of‑scale element.
Separately, the board approved elevation changes that raise an existing flat roof by 2 feet, 10 inches at 41202 Simonton Street and required louvers and painted screening for relocated AC units; the commission also approved removal of an encroaching overhang to clear a city easement.
Votes at a glance
- 1410 Olivia Street (new 1‑story accessory structure): approved (unanimous roll call). - 906 William (new 1‑story residence; 18 solar panels): approved (unanimous roll call). - 917 Center Street (rear addition, small demolition): approved; single reading for demo allowed (motion passed). - Multi‑component renovation (Justin Henneka; pool house and additions): approved with condition to lower side entry and coordinate windows with staff (motion passed; recorded dissenting votes). - 41202 Simonton Street (raise roof, AC screening): approved as modified; removal of overhang approved.
Why it matters
The approvals illustrate HARC’s continuing role in balancing preservation guidelines with contemporary use — from accommodating ADA accessibility and solar installations to negotiating how much historic fabric may be altered without triggering additional procedural readings. The commission applied a mix of design conditions (lowering porch/door heights, altering screening details) and procedural accommodations (single reading for limited demolition) intended to expedite projects while protecting visible historic character.
What’s next
Applicants were instructed to work with HARC staff on final detailing where conditions were applied. Staff was asked to bring forward any required text amendments or a memo so the commission can consider a formal guideline change or an interim process for low‑impact demolition readings.
(Direct quotes in this article are taken from the meeting transcript and attributed to speakers in the meeting record.)
